INTEGRATING CLASSPOINT INTO PRESENTATION MEDIA FOR ENHANCING INTERACTIVE LINEAR ALGEBRA INSTRUCTION
Jakarta Timur, Makasar, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36085/mathumbedu.v13i1.9327Abstract
The limited participation and motivation of students in conventional, lecturer-centered learning environments highlight the necessity for technological innovations that actively promote student engagement. This study aims to design and develop an interactive learning medium utilizing ClassPoint for the Linear Algebra course. The research adopted the ADDIE development model, encompassing the analysis, design, and development phases, and was limited to the validation stage. Two experts served as validators: one in content and the other in instructional media. Validation data were analyzed through quantitative descriptive techniques by calculating the mean percentage score and categorizing feasibility across four assessment aspects—content, presentation, language, and visual design. The validation results revealed that the ClassPoint-based learning media achieved a “highly valid” classification, with an average score exceeding 83%. These findings indicate that the developed media are suitable for classroom implementation and have strong potential to enhance students’ motivation and engagement through interactive features. Future research is recommended to evaluate the effectiveness of the media during the implementation stage, particularly concerning learning outcomes and the development of 21st-century skills..
Keywords: ClassPoint, interactive learning media, media validation, Linear Algebra, ADDIE model.
References
Alfi, N., Paidi, & Pratama, D. (2023). Validating instrument to assess science literacy and independent learning skills in high school. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 9(3), 347–358. https://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/jpbi/article/view/34770
Caldwell, J. E. (2007). Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 6(1), 9–20. https://www.lifescied.org/doi/pdf/10.1187/cbe.06-12-0205
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6
Cevikbaş, M., Greefrath, G., & Siller, H.-S. (2023). Advantages and challenges of using digital technologies in mathematical modelling education – a descriptive systematic literature review. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1142556. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1142556
Chen, P.-Y., Hwang, G.-J., Yeh, S.-Y., Chen, Y.-T., & Chien, T.-W. (2022). Three decades of game-based learning in science and mathematics education: An integrated bibliometric analysis and systematic review. Journal of Computers in Education, 9(3), 455–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-021-00210-y
Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2015). The systematic design of instruction (8th ed.). Pearson Education. https://www.pearson.com/en-us/subject-catalog/p/systematic-design-of-instruction-the/P200000000343/9780132824859
Engelbrecht, J., & Borba, M. (2023). Recent developments in using digital technology in mathematics education. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 56, 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01530-2
Flood, V. J., Shvarts, A., & Abrahamson, D. (2020). Teaching with embodied learning technologies for mathematics: Responsive teaching for embodied learning. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 52, 1307–1331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01165-7
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2003). Educational research: An introduction (7th ed.). Allyn and Bacon. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Educational_Research.html?id=_rRhQgAACAAJ&redir_esc=y
Kasmawati, Zibar, Sisi, Juwariyah, & Sasmin. (2023). Development and validation of digital-based preliminary reading media instruments. Jurnal Pendidikan, 12(4), 218–230. https://e-journal3.undikma.ac.id/index.php/jurnalkependidikan/article/view/7146
Laksana, G. (2024). Validation instruments for local culture-based learning media. Journal of Educational Technology, 8(2), 77–86. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JET/article/view/74446
Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/highereducation/books/multimedia-learning/FB7E79A165D24D47CEACEB4D2C426ECD
Mayer, R. E. (2024). The past, present, and future of the cognitive theory of multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 36, Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09842-1
Muliani. (2023). The influence of ClassPoint media on the learning motivation of physics students. Klasikal: Journal of Education, Language Teaching and Science, 5(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.37891/kpej.v7i1.484
Ní Shé, C., Ní Fhloinn, E., & Mac an Bhaird, C. (2023). Student engagement with technology-enhanced resources in mathematics in higher education: A review. Mathematics, 11(3), 787. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11030787
Prahani, B., Alfin, J., Fuad, A., Saphira, H. V., Hariyono, E., & Suprapto, N. (2022). Learning management system (LMS) research during 1991–2021: How technology affects education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(17). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i17.30763
Prince, M. J. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://crlt.umich.edu/does-active-learning-work-review-research
Saadah, N., & Indrawatiningsih, S. (2024). ClassPoint application as a digital transformation in mathematics education. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan dan Saintek 2024. https://core.ac.uk/download/618272401.pdf
Sari, P. N., Hirahmah, H., Hidayati, S., & Rahim, D. (2023). Validity of interactive learning media integrated critical and creative thinking skills aided by the Lectora Inspire application. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 11(1), 41–52. https://ppjp.ulm.ac.id/journals/index.php/jipf/article/view/7404
Siemens, G. (2023). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age (updated). Frontiers in Education, 8, 1113723. https://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm
St Omer, S. M., Evers, K., Wang, C.-Y., & Chen, S. (2025). Technology-enhanced mathematics learning: Review of the interactions between technological attributes and aspects of mathematics education from 2013–2022. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1079. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05475-7
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Suhery, S., Rohendi, D., Nandiyanto, A. B. D., & Aulia, L. O. (2022). Education 4.0: Expectation and challenges in implementation of technology-based learning in higher education. Sustainability, 14(3), 1493. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1493
Syarif, I., & Som, H. (2025). Development of gamification-based smart education platforms to increase student involvement. Al-Hijr: Journal of Adulearn World. https://doi.org/10.55849/alhijr.v4i1.846
Sweller, J. (2019). Cognitive load theory and educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67, 1–16. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11423-019-09701-3?
Zakariashvili, M. (2022). Integrating GeoGebra math activities into learning management systems (LMS). Georgian Scientists, 4(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.52340/gs.2022.04.03.03
