VALIDITY AND PRACTICALITY OF ENGINEERING DESIGN THINKING-BASED STUDENT WORKSHEETS

Bengkulu, Indonesia

Authors

  • Sukma Lestari Universitas Muhammadiah Bengkulu, Bengkulu, Indonesia
  • Masri Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu, Bengkulu, Indonesia
  • Risnanosanti Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu, Bengkulu, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36085/math-umb.edu.v13i2.10134

Abstract

This study aims to determine the validity and practicality of Engineering Design Thinking (EDT)-based Student Worksheets (LKPD). The research employed a development research method using three of the four stages in the 4D (Four-D) development model, namely define, design, and develop. The research subjects consisted of one teacher and 29 students in the implementation class. The instruments used included expert validation sheets and practicality questionnaires. The results showed that the validity score of the LKPD reached 88.61%, which falls into the "very valid" category. The practicality score based on the teacher's assessment averaged 87.5%, while the students assessment averaged 85.3%, indicating a high level of practicality. Therefore, it can be concluded that the developed Engineering Design Thinking-based LKPD meets the criteria of being valid and practical for use in the learning process.

Keywords: Student Worksheets (LKPD), Engineering Design Thinking (EDT), Validity, Practicality.

References

Aini, NN, & Rosyidi, AH (2023). BASED ON POLYA'S THEORY IN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING OF STATISTICS MATERIAL . 11 (1), 28–41.

Ardana, IM, Gunamantha, IM, Studi, P., Dasar, P., & Ganesha, UP (2022). DEVELOPMENT OF LKPD BASED ON PROBLEM SOLVING WITH THE 4C APPROACH TO IMPROVE ABILITY . 6 (1), 24–32.

Briyanti, O., Sari, M., & Risdianto, E. (2020). Analysis of the need for developing POE-based LKPD assisted by augmented reality to train basic process skills on static fluid concepts . 4 (2), 85–93.

Ina Sukmawati, MAG (2023). Journal of Paedagogy: Journal of Paedagogy: 10 (4), 1020–1033.

Li, Y., Schoenfeld, A.H., Andrea, A., & Graesser, A.C. (2019). Design and Design Thinking in STEM Education . 93–104.

Naufal, MA (2022). PRIMATIKA Journal, Volume 11, Number 2, December 2022. 11 , 129–140.

Nuraini. (2020). Efforts to improve student creativity in stem-based science learning . September , 20–27.

Pradana, LN (2024). Problem-solving Strategy: Mathematical Problem-solving Model Within the Polya' Framework . 2024 , 728–740. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i6.15327

Riyadi, S., Dwi, I., Purwosetiyono, D., & Schleicher, A. (2024). EXPLORATION OF ANDROID MEDIA DESIGN TO IMPROVE STUDENTS' NUMERATION ABILITIES . 9 (1), 170–179.

Rosyda, SS, Sukoco, I., Administration, D., Social, FI, Sukoco, SS, & Management, JS (2020). Design Thinking Model in the Design of the Matengin Aja Application . 03 (01), 1–12.

Siswanto, E., & Rahayu, W. (2025). Optimizing Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability through the Implementation of Problem Based Learning (PBL): Systematic Literature Review . 09 (01), 181–195.

Sofiyana, MS (2021). VALIDATION OF LIKEN ATLAS IN BLITAR CITY Marinda 13 (1), 152–157.

Sundari, S., Fajriah, N., & Hidayanto, T. (2022). Development of E-LKPD Based on Ethnomathematics of Bamboo Woven Handicrafts on Flat Shape Material for Grade VII SMP/MTs. EDU-MAT: Journal of Mathematics Education , 10 (2), 253. https://doi.org/10.20527/edumat.v10i2.13952

Ulum, MB (2021). Identification of the use of EDP (Engineering Design Process) in high school students' engineering thinking through Student Worksheets (LKS) . 8 (2), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.12928/jrkpf.v8i2.20753

Widana, IW, & Sopandi, AT (2021). Development of an Authentic Assessment Model in Mathematics Learning: A Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Approach . 5 (1), 192–209.

Wulandari, PS, Ikhlas, A., & Heswari, S. (2022). PROBLEM-BASED SOLVING ON CIRCLE MATERIAL FOR GRADE VIII . 9 (3), 115–121.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-01

Issue

Section

Articles