Post-Publication Discussion

Jurnal AVICENNA

Constructive criticism, replication findings, methodological issues, requests for clarification, and evidence relevant to reliability may be submitted to the journal.

Readers may submit reasoned post-publication correspondence through official editorial contacts. AVICENNA may also consider substantive concerns raised on moderated and recognized scientific discussion platforms where such concerns can be verified.

Correspondence must clearly identify the article, focus on scientific or ethical issues, distinguish evidence from opinion, avoid harsh language, and disclose relevant conflicts of interest.

Editors assess relevance, specificity, supporting evidence, and materiality. Authors may be invited to provide a response. Independent experts or institutions may be consulted if necessary.

Possible outcomes include a response, clarification, correction, expression of concern, retraction, or other editorial notices. Minor issues may be resolved through correspondence.

Official post-publication notices and responses are linked to the article as technically feasible as possible.