English Students’ Self Instruction Strategy in Following Microteaching Class
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36085/telle.v1i3.2964Abstract
This research was aimed to investigate the strategy of self instruction which is applied by English students as pre-service teacher in following microteaching. The researcher used a descriptive quantitative data to obtain the data about self instruction implemented by students in following microteaching class. The population of this research was 6th semester of English students who enrolled Microteaching class at the English Education Program of Muhammadiyah University of Bengkulu Academic Year 2020/2021. There were 46 students who become the population of this research. The researcher used a questionnaire and observation checklist as the instrument of this research. The finding showed that there were five strategies of self instruction namely; cognitive modelling stage, overt external guidance, overt self guidance, faded overt self guidance, and covert self instruction. Moreover, the dominant role of lecturer was Overt External Guidance.
Â
Keywords: Self Instruction Strategy, Microteaching ClassReferences
Adani et al. (2012). Effect of Self-instruction Strategy on the Achievement in Algebra of Students With Learning Difficulty in Mathematics.
Albin, S., & Shihomeka, S. P. (2017). Learning from Students’ Experiences of Microteaching for Numeracy Education and Learning Support: A Case Study at University of Namibia, Southern Campus. American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences (ASRJETS), 36(1), 306- 318
Benton-Kupper, J. (2001). The microteaching experience: Student perspectives. Education, 121(4), 830-835.
Buyukkarci K 2010. The Effect of Formative Assessment on Learners’ Test Anxiety and Assessment Preferences in EFL Context.PhD Dissertation, Unpublished. Adana, Cukurova University
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approach. (3rd ed). London: SAGE Publication.
Cruickshank, D. R., & Metcalf, K. M. (1993). Improving Preservice Teacher Assessment through on-campus laboratory experiences. Theory Into Practice, 32, 86-92.
Deborah, A. S. (1997; 2004). Self-regulated learning during non-linear self-instruction. In Educational psychology. Michigan: Michigan State University.
Dickinson, Leslie (1987) Self-Instruction in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Graham, S., MacArthur, C., & Schwartz, S. (1992). Knowledge of writing and the composing process, attitude towards writing, and self-efficacy for students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 237–249
Harris, K. R. (1990). Making the writing process work: Strategies for composition and self-regulation.Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
Jones, Francis R. (1998) Self-instruction and success: a learner-profile study. Applied Linguistics 19/3: 378-406.
Kilic, A. (2010). Learner-centered micro teaching in teacher education. International Journal of Instruction, 3, 77-100.
Meichenbaum, D. (1977). Cognitive behaviour modification: An integrative approach. New York: Plenum Press
Muthmainah. (2008). Teaching Strategy On The Teaching Internship.
Saban, A. & Coklar, A. N. (2013). Pre-Service Micro-Teaching Method in Teaching Practice Classes
Sukirman. 2012. Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pedagogia.
Turney, C. et al. 1973. Sidney Micro Skills Redeveloped. Series 1 Handbook: Reinforcement, Basic Questioning, Variability. Australia: Griffin Press Limited
Wilson, G. & I’ Anson, J. (2006). Reframing the Practicum: Constructing Performative Space Initial Teacher Education. Teaching and Teacher education. 22. 353-361
