“ Analysis of Introduction Section Written by Lecturers on Lateralisasi Journal and Math-UMB Edu Journal “

Authors

  • Epi Wadison Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu
  • Mariyah Ulva Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36085/telle.v1i1.1320

Abstract

The aim of this research was to know about introduction section written by Lecturers on Lateralisasi Journal and Math-UMB Edu Journal, the research found that the introduction section of Research article written by Lecturers on Lateralisasi journal and Math-UMB Edu journal were “not sufficient†because the Lecturers did not use all of moves in introduction section based on Swales (1990). The result, all Lecturers did not use Move II, Whereas, in writing a good and strong introduction section must had Move I, Move II, and Move III. Thus, the writer would like to suggest that the Lecturers’ research articles in journal had understand about the concept of Rhetorical move based on Swales in introduction section

 

Key Words : Rhetorical Move, Linguistics Feature, Introduction Section.

References

Fadhila, L.(2018). An Analysis Of Research Article Written By Bengkulu Lecturers In Term Of Rhetorical Move By Swales. Thesis. FKIP Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu.

Fischer, B. A., & Zigmond, M. (2004). Components Of A Research Article. http://www2.gsu.edu/~bioslp/Sci_Methods_Neuro/ComponentsofaResearchArticle.pdf. Diakses 10 Maret 2020.

Flowerdew, J. (1999). Problem in writing for scholarly publication in English: The Case of Hongkong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), 243-264.

Hinkle, H. (2002). Second Language Writers’ Text Linguistic and Rhetorical Features. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Accessed from www.pdfdrive.com

Hyland, K. (2009). Academic Discourse: English in a global context. London, UK : Bloomsbury.

Khamkien, A. (2014). Linguistic Features Of Evaluative Stance: Findings From Research Article Discussions. Indonesian Journal Of Applied Linguistics, 4 (2014). 54-69.

Muangsamai, P. (2018). Analysis of Moves, Rhetorical Patterns and Linguistic Features in New Scientist Articles. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences 39 (2018) 236-243.

Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (2006). Writing Academic English Fourth Edition. New york: Pearson Longman.

Peacock, M. (2002). Communicative Moves in The Discussion Section of Research Articles. System, 30 (4), 479-497.

Safitri, A. (2019). A rhetorical Analysis on The Discussion of English Undergraduate Thesis Written by English Education Students of Muhammadiyah University of Bengkulu. Thesis. FKIP Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu. Bengkulu.

Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. New York: Cambridge University.

Zigmond, S. H.(2004). Formin-induced nucleation of actin filaments. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 16, 99–105. doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2003.10.019

Downloads

Published

2021-01-08

Issue

Section

Articles
Abstract viewed = 197 times